Recently I read Stylize:
A Slightly Obsessive History of Strunk & White’s The Elements of Style
by Mark Garvey. He writes that he may be obsessive about the book. I think that
is an understatement. He is definitely obsessed with that little book.
Obviously he was impressed with the book and must have done a lot of research,
evident by the detailed history.
I was surprised to find myself continuing to read, and
enjoy, this book about a book. Garvey aroused
my curiosity in the history of William Strunk Jr., a professor at Cornell
University and his former student, E. B. White, writer for The New Yorker and
author of Charlotte’s Web and Stuart Little.
Information about the
book written to help students and sold for 25 cents at Cornell and White’s
involvement in the various editions with MacMillan editor Jack Case kept me reading.
I was bored with some of the excerpts and quotes from other authors throughout
the middle of the book. There were just
too many.
I’ve had my copy of Strunk & White, Third Edition, as
long as I can remember, referring to it occasionally, but I didn’t realize it
had such an interesting history, nor that it was so controversial. Writers seem
to love it or hate it, praise it or bash it.
Arthur Plotnik’s book, Spunk
& Bite: A writers guide to punchier, more engaging language & style,
gives reasons why he thinks Strunk & White is too rigid for today’s
changing world. Although he admits he does go back to The Elements of Style to
review sensible rules, his opinions of strict rules comes through in the title
of Chapter One, “E. B. Whitewashed.”
Spunk & Bite offers “A Little Light Unstrunktion,” discussing
flexibility, freshness, texture, force and form. “With some ten million copies
rooted on as many reference shelves, Strunk and White has become the ivy (if
not the kudzu) on our great walls of clarity and correctness.” Later in that chapter he writes that both
Strunk and White knew that bending the rules “can give writing its distinction,
its edge, its very style.” I agree.
I am enjoying the look at different approaches to writing
offered by Plotnik. Although, I’m only half finished the book, I had to check
out the last chapter, Contemporaneity.
Plotkin discusses excess and standing out from the crowd –
to go for broke – whether you win or lose, you learn and can survive. I enjoyed
this section: “What is it that the protagonist of Philip Roth’s American
Pastoral declares about writing in general? ‘As pathological phenomena go, it
doesn’t completely wreck your life.’ Spunky.”
Isn’t it great that we have access to such variety. We can
refer to Strunk & White and then add some spunk and bite to our writing.